Friday, 24 June 2016

PALAVER TREE COMMENTARY: The Myth Called Made-In-Nigeria — Bukola Adebayo

Kaduna Refinery Image: Supplied
Bukola Adebayo writes on the effect of importation of raw materials on Nigerian economy, especially the manufacturing sector

Kudos to our indefatigable manufacturers in Anambra State. One cannot help but marvel at the ingenuity of finished goods that are churned out by designers and traders in the industrial estate and market in Onitsha, the commercial capital of the South-East.

Shoes and suits from the Ariaria market in Aba can be found in closets of top Nigerian celebrities home and abroad. North or South, local manufacturing of finished goods such as beverages, clothing items and other consumers products have increased tremendously.

Apart from suits and shoes, if one checks the labelling on many household goods and confectioneries in most homes, one would see ‘Made-in-Nigeria’ or a complimentary local address.

One is also likely to find the addresses of local companies on many of the drugs used to treat common ailments like diarrhoea, headache and malaria infections.

However, investigations revealed that even though many of these products are said to be “Made-in-Nigeria”, they are actually made abroad.

Manufacturers, who spoke with our correspondent said due to unfavourable policies, lack of infrastructure and investment and the moribund state of the petrochemical and agricultural sector, more than 90% of the raw materials they use are imported from Italy, Germany, China and other countries.

For instance, the only raw material that is sourced locally in the production of sachet water, popularly known as ‘pure water’, is the water itself.

According to the Managing Director, El-Elyon Water, a producer of sachet water in Ibadan, Oyo State, Mr. Tola Adeniyi, 80% of the chemicals used in purifying water and the petrochemicals  used in producing the sachet are imported.

Adeniyi said, “When sachet water manufacturers increased their prices in January from ₦80 to ₦120 per bag, many thought it was informed by fuel scarcity. But the increment came about because of scarcity of forex.

“You may wonder what forex has got to do with sachet water. We import every other material used to purify and package it. None of these chemicals are sourced locally.

“The raw material used to produce the nylon and print materials are imported; the chlorine and other oxidizing agents used to purify the water is imported. The prices of these raw materials have increased by 30% and we can’t shoulder the cost alone.”

It is, indeed, disheartening that Nigeria, the seventh largest producer of crude oil in the world, is also one of the largest importers of petrochemicals, a byproduct of crude oil.

Speaking on the challenges posed by the lack of raw materials in the packaging industry, the Marketing Manager, OAK Group of Companies, producers of Lasena water and plastics, Mr. Eugune Osigwe, warned that the prices of bottled water might increase, as the cost of importing preforms, the raw materials used to produce plastic packaging for water and other drinks, has increased.

According to Osigwe, one  tonne of  the preform, which is imported from China and was ₦450,000 last year,  is now ₦520,000.

Osigwe said, “The plastic and paper industry in Nigeria is 90% dependent on importation. Yes, there are factories producing them, but where are they getting the raw materials? For instance, the pre-chemical form used to make plastics are got from petrochemicals, a by-product of crude oil. How many of our refineries are producing fuel not to talk of the petrochemical used to make plastics? If the refineries were working optimally, we would have no reason to import plastic preforms. We would rather be exporting them to other non-oil-producing countries.”

Apart from exporting crude oil, Osigwe said, if the refineries were functioning, Nigeria should be exporting rather than importing leather, alcohol, fertilizers and other carbon based products .

He said many tyre and leather manufacturing companies left the country when the hope of getting raw materials locally dimmed.

“Leather is a crucial by-product of crude oil. It can be used to make chairs, tyres, shoes, bags and upholstery just to mention a few. With the crude oil reserves that Nigeria has, it should be one of the biggest players in tyre and leather industry in the world, but we are still importing artificial leather from China and Brazil.

“It’s an open secret that Nigeria imports fertilizers for its farmers, which is a disgrace. Nitrogen and many chemicals that are used in making fertilizers are by-products of crude oil. If the refineries were on, we should be exporting, not importing, fertilizers to agric-based economies like Brazil and the United States. It would have been be a source of forex which the country direly needs now.

“More than 40% of the chemicals and raw materials used in paint and print industry can be sourced from crude, but we are still importing them. Oil has been a curse rather than a blessing to this country.”

Adeniyi and Osigwe have every reason to be pained. Nigeria has indeed underutilized the resources that abound in crude oil.

Apart from PMS, a report compiled by Ranken Energy, a global manufacturer of petrochemical products, states that over 5,999 items are made from petroleum by-products.

They include drugs, cosmetics, detergents, perfume, insecticides, vitamin capsules, floor wax, paints and dyes to mention a few.

A partial list of products made from Petroleum (144 of 6000 items) 

One 42-gallon barrel of oil creates 19.4 gallons of gasoline. The rest (over half) is used to make things like:

Source: Ranken Energy


70 % of medicines are imported from India, China
Stakeholders were elated when four pharmaceutical companies in Nigeria got the World Health Organization pre-qualification to produce some essential drugs for West Africa and beyond.

Experts in the sector proclaimed that the certification was a guarantee that Nigeria had the capacity to manufacture and export lifesaving medicines to West African countries and Africa at large.

But no one was more surprised when the Chairman, Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Group of Manufacturers Association of Nigeria, Mr. Okey Akpa, sent a warning to Nigerians to prepare for scarcity of drugs.

Akpa said that the lingering shortage of foreign exchange had prevented drug manufacturers from importing raw materials and chemicals needed to produce essential medicines into the country.

According to him, many drug manufacturers have run out of their stock and are unable to replenish due to dollar insufficiency.

Akpa said, “The only thing to say at this time is to alert the nation to an impending risk and threat to drug security in the country. This is going to happen if the current level of scarcity of forex persists.

“There is going to be absolute drought of raw materials. This time, we are talking about critical raw materials, what we classify as active pharmaceutical ingredients. Nearly every manufacturer is using about the last batch of raw materials and what we see and foresee is scarcity of medicines – essential medicines. When they are available, the cost will go up.”

Akpa had every reason to raise the alarm. Nigeria, with a population of over 170 million people, depends on India and China for its drug supply.

According to the former President of the Pharmaceutical Society of Nigeria, Mr. Azubuike  Okwor, over 70% of medicines  consumed in the country are imported.

He blamed the moribund state of the refineries for this situation. Okwor said local pharmaceutical companies need not import if active ingredients used to produce medicines if the refineries were working.

He stated, “On local manufacturing of drug, a greater percentage of the active ingredients for the local initiatives are all imported, and this is why we call for the creation of a pharmaceutical commission to drive Nigeria’s journey towards local manufacturing of pharmaceuticals replicating the giant strides that China and India have made in these areas.”

Much ado about tomatoes
If you have had any cause to buy tomato paste at the market because of the ongoing tomato scarcity, there is a great possibility that you are consuming a product whose raw material was sourced in an Asian or European country but packaged in Nigeria.

According to the Director-General, Raw Materials Research and Development Council (RMRDC), Peter Onwualu, Nigeria spends over ₦11bn on the importation of 65,809 tonnes of processed tomatoes annually.

Though Nigeria is ranked the second largest producer of tomato in Africa and 13th in the world, the country is also the largest importer of tomato paste, the processed form of the fruit from China and Italy.

According to the Chief Executive Officer, Erisco Foods Limited, Ikeja, a local manufacturer of tomato concentrates, Mr. Eric Umeofia, the Federal Government loses US$1bn to the importation of tomato products.

Umeofia alleged that 80% of imported tomato products in the market were sourced abroad, and they were also adulterated.

He lamented that instead of exporting packaged products, Nigeria was the destination for adulterated tomato concentrates from Asian countries such as China.

Umeofia said, “More than 1,000 containers of packaged tomato paste come in through our porous ports and borders every week. Nigeria is losing US$1bn to tomato paste importation annually. These importers are mostly foreigners, and they have introduced fake tomato concentrates into this country. Once you don’t produce and depend on import, then you give room for fake items.

“Indian businessmen went to China and asked them to produce tomato paste at a reduced cost. Of course, the Chinese did so by reducing the content of tomato and filled it up with starch and added colouring.

“Our research over two years found out that much of the tomato paste they bring into Nigeria is poison. In China, they can’t eat the tomato products that are being brought into this country. So, why are the Indians bringing it here? Because some few government officials and regulators are aiding and abetting these practices, Nigerians will be dying?”

Umeofia described the situation as unfortunate as 70% of tomatoes grown in the country waste due to lack of storage facilities and infrastructure for processing.

“The tomato farmers in Sokoto State suffer great losses every year because there is no facility to store and process them; and the government supports importers rather than helping local manufacturers.

“We decided to go into tomato refining and set up a factory with a capacity of 250,000 tonnes to stop importation but we have been running it at a loss because imported ones are still coming in. By now, we are supposed to be exporting tomato paste from Nigeria. We have the capacity and all it takes to achieve it, if government provides the right policies,” he noted.

Umeofia called on President Muhammed Buhari not to relent in his administration’s bid to ban the importation of tomato products, which, he said, would encourage patronage of local products.

According to him, many local manufacturing companies have shut down due to unfriendly policies.

He said, “In 2015, we almost closed down. We couldn’t sell our tomato products because the fake ones were cheaper to buy.  Because the President said no product that could be made in Nigeria would have foreign exchange allocation, that was when our business started to pick. Now, we have recalled all the workers we sent away and we are now employing more. The import law is already having effect.  If Buhari bans the importation of tomato, we will be exporting tomatoes within 18 months.

“If the Federal Government and regulators give manufacturers 20% of the support they give foreign investors, we would become one of the biggest exporters of tomato products in the world.

“Do you know that the tomato paste industry can create over one million jobs, from the farmers to the engineers, the processors to the marketers? We need foreign investment, but it’s only on technology, not on practical goods. The Made-in-Nigeria campaign can only survive if importation is discouraged entirely,” he added.

This file photo taken on January 15, 2016 shows a trader sorting baskets of tomatoes at the Yankaba vegetables market in northern Nigerian city of Kano, on January 15, 2016. A state government in northern Nigeria on May 24 declared a state of emergency after moths destroyed swathes of tomato fields, threatening supplies of the country’s leading staple food. Nigerian farmers describe the outbreak as ‘tomato Ebola’ after the deadly disease that devastated West Africa in 2014. PHOTO: AFP
The myth called Made-in-Nigeria food
Before oil boom, Nigeria was one of the highest producers of grains, vegetables and food crops in Africa.

It was a taboo to eat food products that were not grown in the country due to abundance of agricultural produce.

The reverse is the case nowadays. According to the Chief Executive Officer, Produce Extracts Limited, Lagos, makers of locally produced wine, Mr. Linus Kotey, more than 80% of locally produced soft drinks and beverages sold in Nigeria are made from imported concentrates.

Kotey, a brewer of over 30 years of experience, spoke to our correspondent when she visited his brewing company at the Lagos State Small Scale Industrial Estate at Matori. He warned that manufacturers’ dependence on raw materials from abroad, especially for food production, could collapse the Nigerian economy.

Kotey said, “Many of the beverages and soft drinks sold in Nigeria are made from imported concentrates. Manufacturers find it difficult to go through the chemical process of converting fresh fruits grown in Nigeria into drinks.  I use local pawpaw and pineapple to make wine, but many brewers won’t do that.

“What the manufacturers do is to add water and sugar to the imported concentrates, pack them and millions of Nigerians consume them.

“That does not help the foreign exchange and the backward integration of local contents. It is sad because more than half of the fruits produced by farmers in the country go to waste. Nigeria spends billions importing raw materials it can produce because there is forex and manufacturers want to take the easy way. The truth is out now because there is shortage of forex,”

Bread, noodles and wheat flour products that Nigerians eat daily are said to be “Made-in-Nigeria”, Kotey, a UK-trained biochemist says this label may be far from the reality.

According to the industrialist, a significant proportion of the raw materials used in manufacturing these food products are imported and poor manufacturing policies from previous governments have allowed the trend to thrive.

Kotey said, “In the brewery industry at the first regime of Buhari, the government banned the importation of barley malt used to produce beverages because Nigeria had sorghum, which is an alternative. The multinationals argued against it but the government put its foot down.

“I was a brewer and I was on the government panel, the companies had to implement it. Nigerians were drinking beer from sorghum and they didn’t know the difference. The policy was overturned by the government that took over, as local farmers who had geared up to produce maize and sorghum lost huge sums of money.

“What the foreign companies do now is that they use 5% sorghum from Nigerian farmers and import barley malt for the rest and it is still called Made-in-Nigeria.”

Besides poor policies on the part of government, Kotey said Nigerians had also stopped eating local foods; they show preference for staple foods whose raw materials, according to him are sourced abroad.

“There is ongoing food colonization in Nigeria. I studied in Britain. Britons eat potatoes fried, mashed and baked. They also grow wheat which they use to make pie or bread. They eat what they grow. Why are we not eating what we grow? Now everybody is eating noodles, wheat, semolina, bread and pastries. These are made from wheat that is imported.

“We are promoting the agricultural sector of another country. What is wrong with eating fufu, garri, yam flour, amala and yam in different forms?  If Nigeria stops the importation of wheat today, I can assure you that the agricultural sector will bounce back.”

Chinese ankara dominates at  Owambe parties
The Nigerian textile business was one of the most vibrant industries in Africa in the 1960s.Traders from Ghana, Mali, and Cote d’Ivoire, among others, came to Nigeria to export the high-quality African print.

Today, the once-flourishing industry has collapsed such that over 80 of the 100 textile industries that used to dot the major cities of Kano, Katsina, Lagos and other parts of the country no longer exist.

According to the Nigerian Textile Manufacturers Association and the Nigerian Textile Garments and Tailoring Employers Association (NTMA/NGTEA), China and Korea-made fabrics have dominated Nigerian market.

The Director-General, NTMA/NGTEA, Mr. Jaiyeola Olarewaju, stated that the policy by the previous governments which lifted the ban on the importation of textiles led to the collapse of over 70 textile companies.

He said that despite the ₦100bn pumped into the textile industry by the Federal Government, the sector had failed to recover from the lifting of the ban on importation of fabrics.

“The Chinese textile manufacturers are squeezing the local industry.  The Chinese fabrics have taken over the market. About 80% of the printed fabrics in the country are imported. So, it is Asian countries that are enjoying the boom in the use of African prints, not Nigeria.

“In 1997, we had about 136,000 workers. Now we have less than 20,000. Now that the government has lifted the ban on importation, what protection is there for local textile industries?”

Way forward
Nigeria is one of the most attractive dumping grounds for exporters due to poor policies and porous borders. The country still imports furniture, pencils, matches, tooth picks and other consumer goods that it has the capacity to produce.

According to Kotey and his colleagues, a majority of the products found in a Nigerian household are imported.

Stakeholders who spoke to the Punch correspondent called on the Federal Government to protect local manufacturers by providing incentives.

According to Kotey, the only way out is for the Buhari administration to ban the use of imported raw materials for products that are available locally as it did in the 70s.

He said, “There was a time that multinationals were using local flavours for their beverages. We must go back to that. If the government can insist that no manufacturer should bring in raw materials that can be sourced locally, the economy will thrive.

“Those who want to still import must be made to pay heavy duties and taxes for this. Gradually, manufacturers will seek alternatives locally and we can reduce the pressure on the foreign exchange available.”

Originally published in The Punch

Saturday, 30 April 2016

PALAVER TREE COMMENTARY: ABDUCTION NATION: Despite Death Sentence, Kidnappings Thrive

These seven suspects reportedly confessed to be involved in kidnapping
Daily Trust checks show that an average of 25 Nigerians are kidnapped every month, while 278 Nigerians have been abducted between May 2015 and April 2016. Also, amounts ranging from ₦250,000 to millions of naira have been demanded as ransom, bringing the total sum to ₦3.3bn.

The rising wave of the crime across the country has left many more afraid of kidnappers than armed robbers or even insurgents. Gone are the days when only expatriates, wealthy individuals and petroleum industry workers were the main targets. Today, anyone can fall victim.

The failure of security agencies at resolving many cases has made matters worse, with many families caving in and agreeing to pay ransom. While there are instances where the police rescue victims without payment of ransoms, there are also many where huge amounts were paid to kidnappers.

There are also instances where the police claim credit for rescuing victims without ransom payments, only for the families of victims to counter the claims by publicly announcing how much they paid to secure the release of their loved ones.

According to reports, most of the kidnappers said they engaged in it because they needed money to solve personal problems as they have no job.

Victims suffer psychological trauma, lack of trust, fear, torture and in some cases even rape, among others.

The 14th April 2014 abduction of about 276 Chibok school girls in Maiduguri by the Boko Haram insurgents remains indelible even as it drew world attention including reactions from US President Barack Obama and other world leaders.

The scourge of kidnapping has forced many states to enact laws recommending capital punishment and long prison sentences for those convicted of kidnapping.

This month alone 32 cases of kidnapping were reported in Enugu, Kano, Cross River, Imo, Rivers, Kaduna, Abia, Kogi, FCT, Delta and Benue states. Since kidnapping is not contained on the exclusive list of the Nigerian Constitution, it is States Houses of Assembly that can enact laws on it.

Kidnapping was made a capital offence in 2009 in Abia, Akwa, Ibom, Anambra, Ebonyi, Enugu, and Imo states to curtail the wave. No kidnapper has however faced the death penalty since the enactment of the laws.

Before the Cross River State Governor, Prof. Ben Ayade, signed into law a bill that prescribes death penalty for convicted kidnappers in the state, and before the Kogi State Executive Council under former Governor Idris Wada approved death penalty for kidnapping and other related criminal activities in the state, Governors Seriake Dickson of Bayelsa and Adams Oshiomhole of Edo states approved the death penalty for kidnappers in 2013. The Delta State House of Assembly also passed the Anti-Kidnapping Bill 2013, imposing a death sentence on any person convicted of kidnapping in the state, into law.

How Nigeria would tackle the menace remains to be seen in the face of other socio-economic and security challenges, even as the nation is held to ransom by kidnappers.
Most of the kidnappers said they engaged in it because they needed money to solve personal problems as they have no job

Deadly Kidnap Gang Holding Kano To Ransom
Daily Trust reports that the Southern part of Kano State has always been peaceful. Until now, when a gang of kidnappers have begun operation in earnest. Called ‘Garkuwa’, Daily Trust checks revealed that members of the gang are Fulani, from Senegal and Cameroon.

The group is organized to the point that they have an emblem, showing a gun and sword crossed, usually on a white flag. It was also gathered that they are in possession of sophisticated weapons, which they deploy during their activities.

The Garkuwa gang’s main targets are, ironically, Fulani resident in Kano State, especially those who own substantial numbers of cattle. Choosing to attack in the wee hours of the morning, about 2:00 to 3:00am, they arrive on motorbikes, and in large number. They always conduct thorough surveillance on targeted communities and victims before striking. Such operations, witnesses disclosed, are sometimes led by a female leader, also said to be non-Nigerian from her accent and mode of dressing.

The female leader, according to a local who encountered the group at Tarai village in Kibiya Local Government, is merciless.

Describing the group’s modus operandi, another source told Daily Trust that a number is given to a victim’s family member to communicate with the kidnappers, without police involvement. “This usually comes with a threat to harm - or even kill - the victim, if law enforcement agents are involved,” the source said.

The Garkuwa gang has been terrorizing various communities in Doguwa, Tudun-Wada, Sumaila, Rano and Kibiya local government areas. In the last three months, the gang has kidnapped about 100 people, among them nursing mothers, children, and the aged, according to the District Head of Tudun-Wada, Dankaden Kano, Dr. Bashir I. Muhammad.

The gang’s operations soon turned deadly, Daily Trust also gathered, as they killed three youths in Tudun-Wada, Kibiya and Sumaila in separate operations.

According to the District Head of Sumaila, Danruwatan Kano, Alhaji Ibrahim Ado Bayero, about 15 persons were kidnapped there. He spoke through a representative, Alhaji Ibrahim Ci-Gari, saying: “Last week Saturday, April 16, the kidnappers stormed Matigwi village and took two persons. They also returned to the same village two days later and grabbed the father of a former member of Kano State House of Assembly, Alhaji Zubairu Masu.

“The most disheartening part is that the kidnappers have informants in most of our communities. That’s our major constraint,” he said, adding that the trend is growing to alarming proportions.

In Tudun Wada local government, 17 people were kidnapped from Dariya, Nata’ala, Burum-Burum, Karafa and Gazobi villages, Dr. Muhammad has confirmed. He said four people have so far paid ransoms to secure release, but the rest remain with their captors.

Also, the Garkuwa gang demands for protection money, sometimes as high as two million naira, so they will not be kidnapped.


Dr. Muhammad also told Daily Trust that the kidnappers recently sent letters to five people in his constituency, warning them to either pay ₦2.5m each or be kidnapped. “Their victims include farmers, tea sellers and all kinds of people,” he said, adding: “This is how the gang has been terrorizing us on a daily basis.” He said people in his domain have resorted to prayer, because the situation was a helpless one.

In Doguwa local government, the stepmother of a serving lawmaker in the State House of Assembly, Alhaji Salisu Ibrahim Riruwai was kidnapped sometime in March this year. “They were so bold, and told me that since I am an influential figure in the state, I should pay sixty million naira ransom.” He later paid ₦2 million before she was released.


Riruwai said kidnapping has become rife in the Southern part of Kano recently, and until something urgent is done, it will continue.

Also in early April, a nursing mother and her baby were picked in Yar-Labi, while a pregnant woman in Burum-Burum village, both in Tudun Wada local government. 

The gang, led by their female commander, stormed Kibiya town in Kibiya local government two weeks ago and kidnapped three persons, including the wife of an ex-member of Kano State House of Assembly, Alhaji Garba Shehu Famar. The two others, a mother and her son were later released while the wife of the ex-lawmaker remains in captivity.

Last week, the kidnappers sent letters to five people in Tudun Wada town ordering them to either pay ₦2.5 million each or be kidnapped, the chairman, Kano state chapter of Fulafulbe Development Association of Nigeria (FULDAN), Alhaji Sanusi Baffa Dawakin-Tofa, confirmed. He added that also in Diwa village, five people were kidnapped within the space of 48 hours.

Dawakin-Tofa added: “From what we gather, the kidnappers aren’t Nigerians. They have collected so much ransom money from people in the various communities they have attacked.”

The District Head of Doguwa local government, Alhaji Aliyu Harazimi, said the Fulani residing in Falgore Forest have now started relocating to Doguwa town, due to persistent kidnappings. “My people have now resorted to self-defence. When the bandits stormed Kudara village recently and kidnapped three, the residents resisted and engaged the kidnappers until they ran for their lives. The trend has now subsided in Doguwa but we are still praying,” he said.

Aliyu Isa Kibiya said the kidnappers are heartless. “They ride in on motorbikes wielding sophisticated weapons. Even if you flee, they would chase you and grab you,” he said, adding that apart from kidnapping, the gang also steals motorcycles.

Another resident of Sumaila local government, Kabiru Idi Gomo, said the menace of kidnapping is massive in the area. “We’re living in fears, as the gang operates almost on a daily basis,” he said.

Also on Thursday, April 28, five more suspected kidnappers, among them a notorious armed robber who has been trailed by the police for two years, were arrested in Nata’ala village, Tudun Wada local government.

However, State Police Commissioner, Alhaji Maigari A. Dikko said although he was recently deployed to Kano, police records of people kidnapped in the Southern part of the state is less than the 100 claimed by some locals. He said they recorded only 21 cases from February to date, and 12 of them have been rescued. He also said 14 people were arrested in connection with kidnaps, with six of them confessing their participation.

The commissioner explained to Daily Trust that four of the confessed kidnappers were arrested in Doguwa, one each in Kibiya and Sumaila and Tudun Wada local government areas. He said: “The kidnappers operate a syndicate and from our findings some of them are from Niger, Kaduna and Bauchi states. They only come to Kano on invitation whenever there is an operation. We have deployed men to the affected places to end the problem.”

Thursday, 21 April 2016

PALAVER TREE COMMENTARY: The President As Chief Diplomat — Reuben Abati

EDITOR’S NOTE: Dr Reuben Abati was a Senior Special Adviser on Media to former President Goodluck Jonathan. Dr Abati, in this piece, gives an “Insider’s point of view” leadership and management issues affecting the role of the Nigerian President in foreign policy and on why Nigeria is considered the “Begin Again” country whereas other countries build cumulatively toward their strategic objectives. Dr Abati appraises Nigeria’ foreign policy scene and observes “We [Nigerian leaders] may have thus reduced foreign policy to individual heroism, which is sad, but institutions and human capital within this arena are critical. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, once a glorious institution is a shadow of its old self. The politicization of that Ministry has done great damage.    . . . Foreign Affairs Ministry officials who want to be seen to be doing something will always try to convince the President to embark on all trips. The dream of every Ambassador on foreign posting is also to have his President visit, even if once during his or her tenure. The resident Ambassador is happy, the Foreign Affairs folks get quality eye-time with the President but the hosts look at us and wonder what is wrong with our country signing the same agreements with the emergence of every President and not being able to act.”
President Muhammadu Buhari speaking at an event at the Presidential Villa, Abuja. Photo: Philip Ojisua
By Reuben Abati (The Guardian, Nigeria)
I read an interesting article recently in which the author, objecting to President Muhammadu Buhari’s frequent travels abroad pointed out that Presidential spokespersons since 1999, including this writer, have always justified such trips using essentially the same arguments. The fellow quoted copiously and derisively from my State House press statements and an article by me titled “The Gains of Jonathan’s Diplomacy”.

Those who object to Presidential travels abroad do so for a number of reasons: (a) the cost on the grounds of frequency and size of estacode-collecting delegation, with multiple officers performing the same function tagging along on every trip, (b) the need to make better use of diplomats in foreign missions and Foreign Ministry officials who can act in delegated capacity; (c) the failure to see the immediate and long-term gains of Presidential junket, thus creating the impression of a jamboree or mindless tourism, and (d) the conviction that the President needs to stay at home to address urgent domestic challenges, rather than live out of a suitcase, in the air. While these reasons may seem understandable, arising as they are from anxieties about reducing wastage and increasing governmental efficiency for the people’s benefit, I still insist that Presidential trips are important, and that by travelling abroad, the President is performing a perfectly normal function.

We may, however, complain about abuses and the reduction of an important function to tourism for after all, in eight years, President Bill Clinton of the United States travelled only 54 times – only by Nigerian standards, but we must also admit that the President is the country’s chief diplomat. In our constitutional democracy, he is the main articulator and implementer of the country’s foreign policy. He appoints ambassadors who function in their various posts as his representatives. He also receives other country’s ambassadors. Emissaries from other countries or multilateral organizations consider their visits incomplete without an audience with the President, and it is his message that they take back home.

He visits other Presidents and he also gets visited by other world leaders; an interaction that provides him an opportunity to give effect to Section 19 of the 1999 Constitution which defines the objectives of Nigeria’s Foreign Policy. In doing this, he is expected to strengthen relationships with other countries, at government to government and people to people levels in the national interest.

The President is also the country’s chief spokesperson, and that is why what he says, or what he does when he is negotiating within the international arena on Nigeria’s behalf is of great consequence, and this is particularly why on at least two occasions recently, Nigerians were inconsolably upset when their President chose a foreign stage to put down his own country, and people. This clarification of the role of the President as the country’s chief diplomat may sound didactic, and I apologize if it comes across as pedantic, but this is necessary for the benefit of those who may be tempted to assume that the job of a President is to sit in one place at home and act as a mechanic and ambulance chaser. The concerns that have been expressed however point to something far more complex, and I seek to now problematize aspects of it.

One of the concerns often expressed is that the trips that have been made by our Presidents since 1999 look too much alike. It is as if every President that shows up, embarks on exactly the same junket to the same locations, for the same reasons: foreign direct investment, agriculture, security, co-operation, etc. etc. accompanied by a large retinue that includes many of the same officials who travelled with the former President and had prepared the same MOUs that will be signed again, with the new spokespersons telling us the same story all over again.

Nigerians are therefore not impressed with the seeming conversion of the country’s foreign policy process into a money-guzzling ritual. This, I think, is the crux of the matter. Whereas our foreign policy objective talks about national interest, what constitutes that national interest has been blurry and chameleonic in the last 55 years and more so since the return to civilian rule in 1999. National interest has been replaced majorly by personal interest and it is the worst tragedy that can befall a country’s foreign policy process. We run a begin-again foreign relations framework because every new President wants to make his own mark. The second point is that he is compelled to do so because in any case, we do not have a strong institution to follow up on existing agreements. The international community knows this quite well, and more serious nations being more strategic and determined in the pursuit of their own interests will bombard a new Nigerian President with invitations to visit. They also know that a new President in Nigeria is likely to cancel or suspend existing agreements or contracts being executed by their nationals. The uncertainty that prevails in Nigeria is so well known, such that the gains recorded by one administration are not necessarily institutionalized.

We may have thus reduced foreign policy to individual heroism, which is sad, but institutions and human capital within this arena are critical. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, once a glorious institution is a shadow of its old self. The politicization of that Ministry has done great damage. When a President visits a country, and enters into agreements that result in Memoranda of Understanding, it is expected that there will be follow up action to be taken by officials either through Bilateral Commissions (where they exist between Nigeria and the respective country) or the issuance of instruments of ratification, leading to due implementation. Nigeria signs all kinds of documents but so many details and agreements are left unattended to. There is too much politics in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and too much rivalry between career foreign affairs personnel and the politicians who do not allow them to function as professionals. This has to stop, otherwise every new President has to start again and embark on trips that should have been taken care of at the level of bilateral commissions or the ministry.

Career foreign affairs personnel are critical to the shaping of foreign policy. They are the agents through which states communicate with each other, negotiate, and sustain relationships. The only thing they complain about in that Ministry is lack of money. It is the same with the Missions abroad. Give them money, but there is always a greater need for professionalism, which makes the diplomats of Nigeria’s golden era so sad. The foreign policy process also works better when there is Inter-Ministerial and Intra-governmental collaboration. The tendency in Nigeria is for every department of government to operate as an independent foreign policy unit. Government officials get invited to functions by foreign embassies, without clearance from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and they just troop there to eat free food, but they never keep their mouths shut. Nigerian officials are probably the most talkative in the world and with foreigners, they will offer their mother’s life history to make them appear important. That is not how to run foreign relations. There must be control, co-ordination, discipline, clarity and sanctions.

Every world leader wants to meet the Nigerian President. Nigeria is a strategic market and a very cheap one too, a source of raw materials and a dumping ground for finished products, with a consumptive population. Our balance sheet in all our relationships is unbalanced even in Africa, which we once described as the centerpiece of our foreign policy. We have toyed with many slogans: dynamic diplomacy, economic diplomacy, concentric circles of medium powers, citizen diplomacy, transformational diplomacy, what else/- the Buharideens are yet to come up with their own, but you wait, they will soon come up with something- really, the truth is that Nigeria’s foreign policy process is not strategic or competitive enough.

Within Africa, it is driven by too much kindness rather than enlightened self-interest, or deliberate search for sustainable advantages. A Donatus mentality has seen Nigeria over the years looking out for its African neighbours, donating money, supporting their causes, but Nigeria has gained little from this charity-driven diplomacy. Many of the countries we have helped to build openly despise us at international meetings, they struggle for positions with Nigeria, they humiliate our citizens in diaspora, and when they return later to beg for vehicles, or money to pay their civil servants or run elections, we still oblige them. The attempt in recent years to review all of this, and be more strategic should be sustained.

We must wield the carrot and the stick more often. American Presidents don’t just visit other countries, they make statements and often alter the course of history with their mere presence as Kennedy did with his visit to Berlin in 1963, Nixon in China in 1972, Jimmy Carter going to Iran in 1977, George Bush, visiting Mexico in 2001, and Obama in Cuba in 2016. In the international arena, we give the impression that we are ready to jump at any and every invitation in order to be seen to be friendly, but we tend to overdo this. Foreign Affairs Ministry officials who want to be seen to be doing something will always try to convince the President to embark on all trips. The dream of every Ambassador on foreign posting is also to have his President visit, even if once during his or her tenure. The resident Ambassador is happy, the Foreign Affairs folks get quality eye-time with the President but the hosts look at us and wonder what is wrong with our country signing the same agreements with the emergence of every President and not being able to act.

It does not help either that with every new President, we talk about reviewing Nigeria’s Foreign Policy. We are probably the only country in the world that is always reviewing Foreign Policy and informing the whole world. That should be the routine work of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Nigeria Institute of International Affairs, with inputs from the Nigerian Institute of Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), the Nigeria Intelligence Agency (NIA), and the Presidential Advisory Committee on Foreign Affairs.

We must never lose sight of a necessary linkage between domestic policy and foreign policy. What exactly is in it for the average Nigerian, for the Nigerian economy and for Nigeria? Do we have the capacity to maximize gains from foreign interactions? Always, the real challenge lies in getting our acts together and tying up the loose ends in terms of sustainable policy choices, infrastructure, culture, leadership, and strategic engagement.

Originally published in The Guardian under the "CROSSROADS" Column